Friday, February 27, 2009

Islamic Sexual Psychopathy


Islamic Sexual Psychopathy -

You hate what you want and cannot have


[See NEW!!!! down below]

You Moslems reading this


You will get impure thoughts and physical reaction.

This is okay, except that Islam does not allow such thoughts and physical evidence of them.

Imam directions on how to avoid such calamity are given further down below.

Using sexuality to mold warriors for Allah.

There is no better warrior than a young man not allowed to have sex. Angry, frustrated, promised women and girls galore from the defeated enemy, these sexually repressed Moslems, want to kill--and to rape.

That is why gangs of Moslems roam free-world cities, looking for women to rape. The excuse is that these women, not being dressed according to Islamic proscribed fashion, are "asking for it."

Rape: Nothing to do with Islam?

Muslim Rape Wave in Sweden

Muslim Rape Epidemic in Sweden and Norway - Authorities Look the Other Way

Pan-European Arab Muslim Gang Rape Epidemic

Norwegian Authorities Still Covering Up Muslim Rapes

The New York Times and Sweden: The Dark Side of Paradise

These incidents of Moslems attacking and raping free (non-Moslem) women and girls, regarding them as "prostitutes" and halal "meat" for Moslem taking and pleasuring--as encouraged by the Koran, ahadith, and the "exemplary life of the self-proclaimed 'prophet"--a rapist and sexual predator himself--is a disease.

This disease, in certain localities, Scandinavia, Australia, etc., has become an epidemic: Moslem gangs roaming about, looking for free women to rape and brutalize. There is, however, a perfect cure for this disease that has become an epidemic:

The Islamic Disease of Rape and the Perfect Cure

How Mahomet duped his followers

Seems like Allah always gave Mahomet everything he asked for. Strange isn't it, how they always agree, Allah and Mahomet?

Want the adopted son's wife? Why not? It's okay. And then there are the female prisoners of war (down to what age? Hmmmmmmm?)

Sura (33:50) - "O Prophet! surely We have made lawful to you your wives whom you have given their dowries, and those whom your right hand possesses out of those whom Allah has given to you as prisoners of war, and the daughters of your paternal uncles and the daughters of your paternal aunts, and the daughters of your maternal uncles and the daughters of your maternal aunts who fled with you; and a believing woman if she gave herself to the Prophet, if the Prophet desired to marry her-- specially for you, not for the (rest of) believers; We know what We have ordained for them concerning their wives and those whom their right hands possess in order that no blame may attach to you; " This is another special command that Muhammad handed down to himself that allows virtually unlimited sex, divinely sanctioned by Allah. One assumes that there was some sort of disgruntlement in the community over Muhammad's hedonism that this "revelation" was meant to assuage.

Read all about

Muhammad's Sex Life

And the Moslems are still buying the bill of goods Mahomet sold to the idiot Arabs who believed that "Allah" was the one talking through him (via Gabriel--the archangel).

Hey, there's a bridge that I've got for you real reasonable here--over the East River going to Brooklyn-- real cheap.

Mahomet had strict rules for the dupes that followed him. No sex with anybody unless you defeat non-Moslems in war. Then you can have the captive women and children of the conquered for sex.

"O Prophet! surely We have made lawful to you your wives whom you have given their dowries, and those whom your right hand possesses out of those whom Allah has given to you as prisoners of war, and the daughters of your paternal uncles and the daughters of your paternal aunts, and the daughters of your maternal uncles and the daughters of your maternal aunts who fled with you; and a believing woman if she gave herself to the Prophet, if the Prophet desired to marry her-- specially for you, not for the (rest of) believers; We know what We have ordained for them concerning their wives and those whom their right hands possess in order that no blame may attach to you; and Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.
Koran Sura (33:50)


Look at what he--the so-pure prophet--was doing while the Moslem men that followed him tried to keep from constant masturbation:

Muhammad's Sex Life

Look here

THE nation's[Australia's] most senior Muslim cleric has blamed immodestly dressed women who don't wear Islamic headdress for being preyed on by men and likened them to abandoned "meat" that attracts voracious animals.

In a Ramadan sermon that has outraged Muslim women leaders, Sydney-based Sheik Taj Din al-Hilali also alluded to the infamous Sydney gang rapes, suggesting the attackers were not entirely to blame.

While not specifically referring to the rapes, brutal attacks on four women for which a group of young Lebanese men received long jail sentences, Sheik Hilali said there were women who "sway suggestively" and wore make-up and immodest dress ... "and then you get a judge without mercy (rahma) and gives you 65 years".

"But the problem, but the problem all began with who?" he asked....

In the religious address on adultery to about 500 worshippers in Sydney last month, Sheik Hilali said: "If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside on the street, or in the garden or in the park, or in the backyard without a cover, and the cats come and eat it ... whose fault is it, the cats or the uncovered meat?

"The uncovered meat is the problem."

The sheik then said: "If she was in her room, in her home, in her hijab, no problem would have occurred."

He said women were "weapons" used by "Satan" to control men.

"It is said in the state of zina (adultery), the responsibility falls 90 per cent of the time on the woman. Why? Because she possesses the weapon of enticement (igraa)."

Posted by Robert at October 25, 2006 05:5 4 PM Jihad Watch

"The uncovered meat is the problem."


from Dhimmi Watch:

Islam's young men are often sexually insane. Arab moms have this folk idea that if they pull on their little boy's penises it will make it bigger and make them 'manlier' so basically, and I have seen this in both Egypt and Syria - Arab moms masturbate even INFANTS till they are writhing in dry orgasm.

It is done with barely concealed sadism and the battered islamic moms seem to 'worship' and yet in some primordial way hate their sons.

Older men routinely sexually abuse boys and girls and the whole culture is perfaced with intense shame/honor/guilt complexes. Sex is brutal, domineering and fraught with violence.

Posted by: poetcomic1 [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 22, 2007 12:16 PM at Dhimmi Watch

And . . .

Posted by: Silvester [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 22, 2007 02:39 PM
at Dhimmi Watch

Speaking of segregation, a muslim describes how it creates sex-crazed men in Saudi Arabia:

Former Jihadist Ed Hussain writes from and about Saudi Arabia and sex there:

Faye [my wife] was not immodest in her dress. Out of respect for local custom, she wore the long black abaya and covered her hair in a black scarf. In all the years I had known my wife, never had I seen her appear so dull. Yet on two occasions she was accosted by passing Saudi youths from their cars. On another occasion a man pulled up beside our car and offered her his phone number.

In supermarkets I only had to be away from Faye for five minutes and Saudi men would hiss or whisper obscenities as they walked past. When Faye discussed her experiences with local women at the British Council they said: “Welcome to Saudi Arabia.”

After a month in Jeddah I heard from an Asian taxi driver about a Filipino worker who had brought his new bride to live with him in Jeddah. After visiting the Balad shopping district the couple caught a taxi home. Some way through their journey the Saudi driver complained that the car was not working properly and perhaps the man could help push it. The passenger obliged. Within seconds the Saudi driver had sped off with the man’s wife in his car and, months later, there was still no clue as to her whereabouts.

We had heard stories of the abduction of women from taxis by sex-deprived Saudi youths. At a Saudi friend’s wedding at a luxurious hotel in Jeddah, women dared not step out of their hotel rooms and walk to the banqueting hall for fear of abduction by the bodyguards of a Saudi prince who also happened to be staying there.

Why had the veil and segregation not prevented such behaviour? My Saudi acquaintances, many of them university graduates, argued strongly that, on the contrary, it was the veil and other social norms that were responsible for such widespread sexual frustration among Saudi youth.

At work the British Council introduced free internet access for educational purposes. Within days the students had downloaded the most obscene pornography from sites banned in Saudi Arabia, but easily accessed via the British Council’s satellite connection. Segregation of the sexes, made worse by the veil, had spawned a culture of pent-up sexual frustration that expressed itself in the unhealthiest ways.

Using Bluetooth technology on mobile phones, strangers sent pornographic clips to one another. Many of the clips were recordings of homosexual acts between Saudis and many featured young Saudis in orgies in Lebanon and Egypt. The obsession with sex in Saudi Arabia had reached worrying levels: rape and abuse of both sexes occurred frequently, some cases even reaching the usually censored national press.

My students told me about the day in March 2002 when the Muttawa [the religious police] had forbidden firefighters in Mecca from entering a blazing school building because the girls inside were not wearing veils. Consequently 15 young women burnt to death, but Wahhabism held its head high, claiming that God’s law had been maintained.

As a young Islamist, I organised events at college and in the local community that were strictly segregated and I believed in it. Living in Saudi Arabia, I could see the logical outcome of such segregation.

In my Islamist days we relished stating that Aids and other sexually transmitted diseases were the result of the moral degeneracy of the West. Large numbers of Islamists in Britain hounded prostitutes in Brick Lane and flippantly quoted divorce and abortion rates in Britain. The implication was that Muslim morality was superior. Now, more than ever, I was convinced that this too was Islamist propaganda, designed to undermine the West and inject false confidence in Muslim minds.

I worried whether my observations were idiosyncratic, the musings of a wandering mind. I discussed my troubles with other British Muslims working at the British Council. Jamal, who was of a Wahhabi bent, fully agreed with what I observed and went further. “Ed, my wife wore the veil back home in Britain and even there she did not get as many stares as she gets when we go out here.” Another British Muslim had gone as far as tinting his car windows black in order to prevent young Saudis gaping at his wife.

The problems of Saudi Arabia were not limited to racism and sexual frustration.

Continued at Ed Hussain

How a British jihadi saw the light


  • 23:1,5-6 The believers .... abstain from sex, Except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or (the captives) whom their right hands possess,- for (in their case) they are free from blame,

  • 70:29-30,35 And those who guard their chastity, Except with their wives and the (captives) whom their right hands possess,- for (then) they are not to be blamed, ... Such will be the honoured ones in the Gardens (of Bliss).

Muhammad can go beyond the four-wife restriction, can treat his own wives and sex slaves unequally

33:50-52 O Prophet! We have made lawful to thee thy wives to whom thou hast paid their dowers; and those whom thy right hand possesses out of the prisoners of war whom God has assigned to thee; and daughters of thy paternal uncles and aunts, and daughters of thy maternal uncles and aunts, who migrated (from Makka) with thee; and any believing woman who dedicates her soul to the Prophet if the Prophet wishes to wed her;- this only for thee, and not for the Believers (at large); We know what We have appointed for them as to their wives and the captives whom their right hands possess;- in order that there should be no difficulty for thee. And God is Oft- Forgiving, Most Merciful. Thou mayest defer (the turn of) any of them that thou pleasest, and thou mayest receive any thou pleasest: and there is no blame on thee if thou invite one whose (turn) thou hadst set aside. This were nigher to the cooling of their eyes, the prevention of their grief, and their satisfaction - that of all of them - with that which thou hast to give them: and God knows (all) that is in your hearts: and God is All-Knowing, Most Forbearing. It is not lawful for thee (to marry more) women after this, nor to change them for (other) wives, even though their beauty attract thee, except any thy right hand should possess (as handmaidens): and God doth watch over all things.

Also see
Sexual Manhandling of Women in Egypt

Wahabbis, Sex, History And All That Jazz has this to say (among other interesting stuff):

"Desert Islam is neurotic about sex- and anything remotely suggestive of sex. They believe that men and women, if allowed to mingle freely for even the shortest time, will end up in a sexual embrace. That is why sexual segregation is a fact of life in Universities in the region. In Saudi Arabia, men and women aren't just segregated. They attend different institutions. Interestingly, male teachers are allowed to interact with female students- provided they are in a different room- equipped with a video camera. If a female student has a question, she must use a telephone. Really (see Dr Sanity here, and here. Shrinkwrapped has an excellent post on the subject)."

from Wahabbis, Sex, History And All That Jazz

Also of great interest to Muslim psychopathy is :


An excerpt from SHAME, THE ARAB PSYCHE, AND ISLAM, that most excellent piece, is this quote:

"The Arab world is suffering a crisis of humiliation. Their armies are routed not only by Americans, but also by tiny, Jewish Israel; and as Arthur Koestler once remarked, the Arab world has not, in the last 500 years or so, produced much besides rugs, dirty postcards, elaborations on the belly-dance esthetic (and, of course, some innovative terrorist practices). They have no science to speak of, no art, hardly any industry save oil, very little literature, and portentous music which consists largely of lugubrious songs celebrating the slaughter of Jews.

"Now that the Arabs have acquired national consciousness, and they compare their societies to other nations, these deficiencies become painfully evident, particularly to the upper-class Arab kids who attend foreign universities. There they learn about the accomplishments of Christians, Jews, (Freud, Einstein, for starters) and women. And yet, with the exception of Edward Said, there is scarcely a contemporary Arab name in the bunch. No wonder, then, that major recruitment to al-Qaeda's ranks takes place among Arab university students. And no wonder that suicide bombing becomes their tactic of choice: it is a last-ditch, desperate way of asserting at least one scrap of superiority—a spiritual superiority—over the materialistic, life-hugging, and ergo shameful West.

But this tactic is not, I suggest, a product of Islam. Rather, it is a product of the bruised Arab psyche. . . . "

* * *

"Arab women are elected for the special role of the inferior who, by definition, lacks honor. Arab men eradicate shame and bolster their shaky self-esteem by imposing the shameful qualities of the dhimmi, submission and passivity, upon women. Trailing a humbled woman behind them, Arab men can walk the walk of the true macho man.

"Hence the relative lack of material achievement by Arabs: the Arab world has stunted the female half of its brain pool, while the men acquire instant self-esteem not by real accomplishment, but by the mere fact of being men, rather than women. No wonder, then, that the Arab nations feel irrationally threatened by the very existence of Israel. Like America, the Jews have brought the reality of the liberated woman into the very heart of the Middle East, into dar al-Islam itself. Big Satan and Little Satan: the champions of Muslim women."

The foregoing is a quote by Dr. Sanity from Saving Arabs From Themselves by Dr. Leo Gutmann

Muslim men and their Masculinity

In his Yes This IS Islam Dr. Sanity tells us about a . . .

. . . 14 year old girl, abducted and raped by an adult male, who on her rescue and return to her family was brutally murdered by her father for "shaming" the family.

[We ask:]

Why are Muslim Men . . .

. . . raging, dysfunctional . . . shaky about their masculinity . . . ?

Dr. Sanity says:

. . . over and over again we hear the refrain that the behavior of muslim men toward muslim women is "not" Islam. That it is contrary to "real" Islam (despite the manuals issued by imams on how to beat a wife or daughter so that it doesn't "show"). We even witness the apologists among the women who claim that covering themselves is their "choice" and allows them to be who they "really are".

Frankly, this bullshit is beginning to make me sick. I have no problem with such muslim women apologists wearing whatever they want. But their perspective would be ever so much more persuasive if women who choose NOT to have their individual identities submerged under a shapeless, formless and oppressive religion, were not murdered so frequently by raging, dysfunctional men, shaky about their masculinity."

--from This IS Islam

End of NEW

And here is the promised

Masturbation (How to Cure yourself of It)
by some Imam or other

(brought back by popular demand)

Listen to the Imam:

The person involved in [self-]masturbation is almost certainly a victim of evil gazes. It is
thus imperative to strictly guard the gaze. Where it is practical, avoid all such situations
where ones gaze may fall on Ghayr Mahram females (women not prohibited in Nikah).
TV, books, magazines, internet, newspapers, should be shunned.

Should one's gaze accidentally fall on some woman, immediately lower the gaze. This is
not difficult. It only requires some courage and training….

By maintaining the gaze, one is in fact moving to the depths of Jahannum (hell). And by
lowering the gaze, one is ascending to the highest ranks of Jannah [heaven]….

Consider the reality of the woman at whom one is gazing. If she does not groom herself
or apply perfume for one day, she will look dreadful and stink. For a number of days
every month she has impurity pouring out of her. If one had to just go near such impurity,
one will wish to flee. Imagine if she went to the toilet and forgot to flush and, if you had to
enter the toilet, will you still have the desire to gaze on her? If this woman does not have
Deen, then by raising her arms and exposing her unsightly arm pits, she will give out the
smell of a skunk. These are some thoughts (although undignified) which will assist one in
taming the evil desire to look at women….

Try as far as possible to remain in the state of Wudhu. In the Hadith we are informed that
Wudhu is the weapon of Mu'min. With this weapon it is much easier for him to thwart the
onslaughts of Shaytaan….

Try to remain in the company of the true friends of Allah Ta'ala. The true friends are
those that, when you sit with them they remind you of Allah Ta'ala and their company
produces a desire for the Aakhirah (hereafter). The company of such people is extremely
effacious in imbuing the obedience of Allah Ta'ala, and in cultivating an abhorrence of

May Allah Ta'ala save you and every Ummati from this evil, Aameen.

And Allah Ta'ala Knows Best.

[NOTE: The above anti-masturbation instructions are taken from Naked Islam]

How to Discourage these Sexual Predators--the Moslem Rapists

For further--and more detailed--instructions, please go to:

The Islamic Disease of Rape and the Perfect Cure

Muslim Sexual Psychopathy


"Bear in mind that [Sayyid] Qutb was a life-long bachelor, noted for his sickly, pale appearance and introverted personality and there is no evidence of his ever having had a sexual relationship. (source: Hamudah, Sayyid Qutb p.60-61),
Amrika allati Ra'aytu, (America that I Saw), quoted in All Things Considered, May 6, 2003 "

Sayyid Qutb
(IPA pronunciation: 'saɪjɪd 'qʊtb) ((also Seyyid, Sayid, Sayed; also Koteb, Kutb) (Arabic: سيد قطب‎; 9 October 1906[1]29 August 1966) was an Egyptian intellectual author, and Islamist associated with the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood. He is best known for his theoretical work on redefining the role of Islamic fundamentalism in social and political change, particularly in his books Social Justice and Ma'alim fi-l-Tariq (Milestones). His extensive Quranic commentary Fi zilal al-Qur'an (In the shades of the Qur'an) has contributed significantly to modern perceptions of Islamic concepts such as jihad, jahiliyyah, and ummah.

Qutb's personal life was not always happy. Though Islam gave him much peace and contentment,[2] he suffered from respiratory and other health problems throughout his life and was known for "his introvertedness, isolation, depression and concern." In appearance, he was "pale with sleepy eyes."[3] Qutb never married, in part because of his steadfast religious convictions. While the urban Egyptian society he lived in was becoming more Westernized, Qutb believed the Quran (Surat al-Nisa, 4:32) taught women that `Men are the managers of women's affairs ...' [4] Qutb lamented to his readers that he was never able to find a woman of sufficient "moral purity and discretion" and had to reconcile himself to bachelorhood. [5]

Qutb was extremely critical of many things in the United States, its racism, materialism, individual freedom, economic system, poor haircuts,[6] triviality, restrictions on divorce, enthusiasm for sports, "animal-like" mixing of the sexes (which went on even in churches),[7] and lack of support for the Palestinian struggle. In an article published in Egypt after his travels, he noted with disapproval the sexuality of Americans:

the American girl is well acquainted with her body's seductive capacity. She knows it lies in the face, and in expressive eyes, and thirsty lips. She knows seductiveness lies in the round breasts, the full buttocks, and in the shapely thighs, sleek legs — and she shows all this and does not hide it. [8]

And their taste in music :

Jazz is his preferred music, and it is created by Negroes to satisfy their love of noise and to whet their sexual desires ... [9]

. . . Qutb concluded that major aspects of American life were "primitive" and shocking. His experiences in the U.S. partly formed the impetus for his rejection of Western values and his move towards radicalism upon returning to Egypt. Resigning from the civil service, he joined the Muslim Brotherhood in the early 1950s[10] and became editor-in-chief of the Brothers' weekly Al-Ikhwan al-Muslimin, and later head of the propaganda section, as well as an appointed member of the Working Committee and of the Guidance Council, the highest branch in the Brotherhood. [11]

Qutb's loathing of the West goes well beyond hatred of imperialism or materialism. To Qutb, Europe and North America are "backward," a "rubbish heap ... filth ... hollow and worthless" (p.139, 136). [15] They have nothing to offer the Muslim world. Though aware that Western Civilization possesses nothing "which will satisfy its own conscience and justify its existence" (p.7), the West is pursuing a "well-thought-out scheme" to "demolish the structure of Muslim society," (p.116) which, unlike the West, can "justify its existence."

Western society is immoral...

Look at this capitalism with its monopolies, its usury and whatever else is unjust in it; at this individual freedom, devoid of human sympathy and responsibility for relatives except under the force of law; at this materialistic attitude which deadens the spirit; at this behavior, like animals, which you call `free mixing of the sexes;` [16] at this vulgarity which you call `emancipation of women;` at these unfair and cumbersome laws of marriage and divorce, which are contrary to the demands of practical life; and at Islam, with its logic, beauty, humanity and happiness ... these facts, when seen in the light of Islam made the American people blush. Yet there are people -- exponent of Islam -- who are defeated before this filth ... they search for resemblances to Islam among this rubbish heap of the West ... [p.139]

  • [16] At a time when an overwhelming number of Americans married as virgins or only had premarital sex with their future spouse,
    [source: for example over 80% of the women surveyed who were born between 1933 and 1942 either had no premarital intercourse or premarital intercourse only with their future husband, according to the National Health and Social Life Survey (Sex in America : A definitive Survey by Robert T. Michael, John H. Gagnon, Edward O. Laumann, Gina Kolata, Little Brown and Co., 1994)],
    Qutb sputtered "at this behavior, like animals, which you call `free mixing of the sexes.`"

    How did he get the idea that the Western, in this case American, sexual behavior he witnessed was animal-like? Likely in part from his own psychological projections. He describes the "American girl" as being

    well acquainted with her body's seductive capacity. She knows it lies in the face, and in expressive eyes, and thirsty lips. She knows seductiveness lies in the round breasts, the full buttocks, and in the shapely thighs, sleek legs -- and she shows all this and does not hide it.

    (Bear in mind that Qutb was a life-long bachelor, noted for his sickly, pale appearance and introverted personality and there is no evidence of his ever having had a sexual relationship. (source: Hamudah, Sayyid Qutb p.60-61),
    Amrika allati Ra'aytu, (America that I Saw), quoted in All Things Considered, May 6, 2003 ))

    Maybe also from an encounter with "a young American women at the [educational] institute in Greeley, CO," who allegedly told an appalled Qutb that

    The issue of sexual relations is purely a biological matter. You ... complicate this matter by imposing the ethical element on it. The horse and mare, the bull and the cow ... do not think about this ethical matter ... and, therefore live a comfortable, simple, and easy life. (from Amrika allati Ra'aytu, (America that I Saw), quoted in Radical Islamic Fundamentalism: the Ideological and Political Discourse of Sayyid Qutb by Ahmad S. Moussalli, American University of Beirut, 1992, p.29)

    Obviously most Americans, especially in conservative post-war America, did not/would not agree with this. What Qutb passed on to thousands, perhaps eventually hundreds of thousands, of Muslims as the typical American attitude seems far more likely to have been either fiction or an undergrad's attempt to freak-out this uptight, middle-aged foreigner, his pious disapproval intensified by her "body's seductive capacity."

  • from

    Men can marry up to four women if they treat them equally; unlimited forcible concubines permitted

    In Islam, not only are men allowed to practice polygamy, but they may also capture women in war and use them as sex slaves. This is considered morally legitimate according to the Quran. In other words, non-Muslim women have no right to be free from the horror of slavery and serial rape by Muslim military men.

    • 4:3 Marry women of your choice, Two or three or four; but if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one, or (a captive) that your right hands possess, that will be more suitable, to prevent you from doing injustice.

    • 4:24 Also (prohibited are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess

    • 4:25 If any of you have not the means wherewith to wed free believing women, they may wed believing girls from among those whom your right hands possess

    • 23:1,5-6 The believers .... abstain from sex, Except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or (the captives) whom their right hands possess,- for (in their case) they are free from blame,

    • 70:29-30,35 And those who guard their chastity, Except with their wives and the (captives) whom their right hands possess,- for (then) they are not to be blamed, ... Such will be the honoured ones in the Gardens (of Bliss).

    Muhammad can go beyond the four-wife restriction, can treat his own wives and sex slaves unequally

    • 33:50-52 O Prophet! We have made lawful to thee thy wives to whom thou hast paid their dowers; and those whom thy right hand possesses out of the prisoners of war whom God has assigned to thee; and daughters of thy paternal uncles and aunts, and daughters of thy maternal uncles and aunts, who migrated (from Makka) with thee; and any believing woman who dedicates her soul to the Prophet if the Prophet wishes to wed her;- this only for thee, and not for the Believers (at large); We know what We have appointed for them as to their wives and the captives whom their right hands possess;- in order that there should be no difficulty for thee. And God is Oft- Forgiving, Most Merciful. Thou mayest defer (the turn of) any of them that thou pleasest, and thou mayest receive any thou pleasest: and there is no blame on thee if thou invite one whose (turn) thou hadst set aside. This were nigher to the cooling of their eyes, the prevention of their grief, and their satisfaction - that of all of them - with that which thou hast to give them: and God knows (all) that is in your hearts: and God is All-Knowing, Most Forbearing. It is not lawful for thee (to marry more) women after this, nor to change them for (other) wives, even though their beauty attract thee, except any thy right hand should possess (as handmaidens): and God doth watch over all things.

    Nobody can marry Muhammad's widows after he is dead

    • 33:53 And when ye ask (his ladies) for anything ye want, ask them from before a screen: that makes for greater purity for your hearts and for theirs. Nor is it right for you that ye should... marry his [Muhammad's] widows after him at any time. Truly such a thing is in God's sight an enormity.

    Muhammad's wives should stay in their houses

    • 33:32-33 O Consorts of the Prophet! ... stay quietly in your houses, and make not a dazzling display, like that of the former Times of Ignorance;

    Muhammad decides to marry his adopted son's wife, despite objections

    The prophet Muhammad forced his adopted son, Zaid, to divorce his wife so that Muhammad could marry her. This was scandalous for the community, but Muhammad claimed he did this because God told him to, and he told the Muslims they had no right to question his decisions. Most people thought the real reason was because Muhammad lusted after a married woman and used his authority over the community to do whatever he desired, which seems like a more likely explanation.

    • 33:36-39 It is not fitting for a Believer, man or woman, when a matter has been decided by God and His Apostle to have any option about their decision: if any one disobeys God and His Apostle, he is indeed on a clearly wrong Path. Behold! Thou didst say to one who had received the grace of God and thy favour: "Retain thou (in wedlock) thy wife, and fear God." But thou didst hide in thy heart that which God was about to make manifest: thou didst fear the people, but it is more fitting that thou shouldst fear God. Then when Zaid had dissolved (his marriage) with her, with the necessary (formality), We joined her in marriage to thee [Muhammad]: in order that (in future) there may be no difficulty to the Believers in (the matter of) marriage with the wives of their adopted sons, when the latter have dissolved with the necessary (formality) (their marriage) with them. And God's command must be fulfilled. There can be no difficulty to the Prophet in what God has indicated to him as a duty. It was the practice (approved) of God amongst those of old that have passed away. And the command of God is a decree determined. (It is the practice of those) who preach the Messages of God, and fear Him, and fear none but God. And enough is God to call (men) to account.

    Muhammad can divorce his wives whenever he wants and get new ones who are more submissive

    • 66:1-5 O Prophet! Why holdest thou to be forbidden that which God has made lawful to thee? Thou seekest to please thy consorts. But God is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. God has already ordained for you, (O men), the dissolution of your oaths (in some cases): and God is your Protector, and He is Full of Knowledge and Wisdom. When the Prophet disclosed a matter in confidence to one of his consorts, and she then divulged it (to another), and God made it known to him, he confirmed part thereof and repudiated a part. Then when he told her thereof, she said, "Who told thee this? "He said, "He told me Who knows and is well-acquainted (with all things)." If ye two turn in repentance to Him, your hearts are indeed so inclined; But if ye back up each other against him, truly God is his Protector, and Gabriel, and (every) righteous one among those who believe,- and furthermore, the angels - will back (him) up. It may be, if he divorced you (all), that God will give him in exchange consorts better than you,- who submit (their wills), who believe, who are devout, who turn to God in repentance, who worship (in humility), who travel (for Faith) and fast,- previously married or virgins.

    "Lewd" women should be punished with life imprisonment

    • 4:15 If any of your women are guilty of lewdness, Take the evidence of four (Reliable) witnesses from amongst you against them; and if they testify, confine them to houses until death do claim them, or God ordain for them some (other) way.

      It is unclear what "lewdness" actually means. This verse is so open-ended, almost any woman could potentially be accused of lewdness and sentenced to a life of house arrest, except ultraconservative women who never do anything to offend strict Muslim men.

    Husbands should beat disobedient wives

    • 4:34 Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because God has given the one more (strength) than the other, and because they support them from their means. Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient, and guard in (the husband's) absence what God would have them guard. As to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, admonish them (first), (Next), refuse to share their beds, (And last) beat them (lightly); but if they return to obedience, seek not against them Means (of annoyance): For God is Most High, great (above you all).

      Note: parenthetical insertions make this verse sound less harsh than it really is in more literal translations. For example, the original Arabic text does not say to beat wives "lightly" -- just to beat them.

    Stealing should be punished by amputation of hands

    • 5:41 As to the thief, Male or female, cut off his or her hands: a punishment by way of example, from God, for their crime: and God is Exalted in power.

      When a person has no hands, they probably cannot earn a living anymore, so they will end up as a beggar on the street. That doesn't seem very beneficial to society. Also, before medical sanitation and anesthesia, amputation of the hands was in many cases the equivalent of a death sentence.

    Adultery and fornication must be punished by flogging with a hundred stripes

    • 24:2 The woman and the man guilty of adultery or fornication,- flog each of them with a hundred stripes: Let not compassion move you in their case, in a matter prescribed by God, if ye believe in God and the Last Day: and let a party of the Believers witness their punishment.

      This verse leaves no other option for Muslims who believe in the divine origin of the Quran. It specifically says they must not have mercy on people who have committed adultery or fornication, and that this brutal punishment of 100 lashes is "prescribed by God." However, since other verses in the Quran specifically allow men to have sex slaves, the horrible crime of serial rape against a non-Muslim woman is not considered adultery or fornication and would not be punished if the woman is considered a concubine.

    People who have committed adultery or fornication lose the right to marry chaste Muslims

    • 24:3 Let no man guilty of adultery or fornication marry any but a woman similarly guilty, or an Unbeliever: nor let any but such a man or an Unbeliever marry such a woman: to the Believers such a thing is forbidden.

    Anyone who falsely accuses a chaste woman should be flogged with eighty stripes

    • 24:4-5 And those who launch a charge against chaste women, and produce not four witnesses (to support their allegations),- flog them with eighty stripes; and reject their evidence ever after: for such men are wicked transgressors;- Unless they repent thereafter and mend (their conduct); for God is Oft- Forgiving, Most Merciful.

    Women should wear veils outside the home

    • 24:30-31 Say to the believing men that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty: that will make for greater purity for them: And God is well acquainted with all that they do. And say to the believing women that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty; that they should not display their beauty and ornaments except what (must ordinarily) appear thereof; that they should draw their veils over their bosoms and not display their beauty except to their husbands, their fathers, their husband's fathers, their sons, their husbands' sons, their brothers or their brothers' sons, or their sisters' sons, or their women, or the slaves whom their right hands possess, or male servants free of physical needs, or small children who have no sense of the shame of sex; and that they should not strike their feet in order to draw attention to their hidden ornaments. And O ye Believers! turn ye all together towards God, that ye may attain Bliss.

    Coverings should be worn by women in open society to prevent molestation (except the elderly)

    • 33:59 O Prophet! Tell thy wives and daughters, and the believing women, that they should cast their outer garments over their persons (when abroad): that is most convenient, that they should be known (as such) and not molested. And God is Oft- Forgiving, Most Merciful.

    • 24:60 Such elderly women as are past the prospect of marriage,- there is no blame on them if they lay aside their (outer) garments, provided they make not a wanton display of their beauty: but it is best for them to be modest: and God is One Who sees and knows all things.

      It is unclear what exactly these "outer garments" are or how completely they are supposed to cover the woman's body, but restrictive garments such as the Afghan burqa would certainly be in accordance with the Quran, and probably originated because of these Quranic verses.

    Some people are mischief-makers but don't realize it

    Let's end with this interesting verse:

    • 2:11-12 When it is said to them: "Make not mischief on the earth," they say: "Why, we only Want to make peace!" Of a surety, they are the ones who make mischief, but they realise (it) not.

      This verse is very ironic. The mischief-makers in this verse sound a lot like what Muslims say today: "Islam is a religion of peace!" they insist, while Muslim fundamentalists around the world are practicing terrorism, fighting wars in the name of Islam, violating people's basic human rights and abusing women according to the teachings of the Quran.

    Atta's Rage Rooted in Islam's Misogyny

    By Jamie Glazov

    October 12, 2001

    PHOTO: Reuters

    MOHAMMED ATTA, the terrorist involved in the September 11 crime against humanity, left behind an illuminating will. He sternly warned against women being present at his funeral – or at his grave at any later date. He also instructed that: "He who washes my body around my genitals should wear gloves so that I am not touched there."
    Atta obviously had a lot of problems.

    But far from being the testament of an alienated madman, Atta’s will directly reflects the deep-rooted misogyny within Islam itself. And it is misogyny, and all the self-contempt and rage that it nurtures in males, that fertilized the soil in which the pernicious evil of Atta – and of his colleagues -- grew.

    In Woman in the Muslim Unconscious, Moroccan scholar Fatna Sabbah documents how the crucial criteria of female "beauty" in Islamic society are silence, immobility, and obedience. Women are supposed to dehumanize themselves in order to be tolerated.

    In Islam, males are taught to control desire (shahwa). Women are the incarnation of shahwa. Shahwa comes from the devil. It becomes clear, therefore, why the association of shahwa, the devil and woman is rife throughout Islamic religious literature.

    Imam Ibn al-Jawzi taught that female beauty was a manifestation of the devil himself. In his text Dhamm al-hawa, he wrote that the "beauty of women is one of the poisoned arrows of the devil." It is no wonder, therefore, why Islam teaches that hell is largely populated by women. According to a hadith (the record of the sayings of Prophet Muhammad) in Imam Bukhari’s Al-Sahih, the Prophet Muhammad states that, as he stood at the gate of hell, he observed that, "Most of those who entered there were women."

    In Islam, sex is allowed only in marriage, but even then it is not viewed as an act between two complementary and equal human beings. It is an act concerning only the orgasmic need of the male. Since this need is prioritized, Islam allows the male to marry four wives at a time. The male can also go through serial marriages, since he is allowed to dissolve a marriage unilaterally at any time by simply saying to his wife: "you are repudiated."

    Thus, a man does not have to invest in one woman. The concept of "the couple" is shattered; the individual woman is seen as useless and expendable. The confusion in which Middle Eastern boys grow up, therefore, is a given. With all kinds of siblings born of different women -- who obviously weren’t good enough to be cherished alone –- the boys get their first taste of misogyny and, therefore, self-hate (since they internalize the notion that their own mothers were valueless).

    Since it emphasizes the importance of Muslims conquering all non-Muslims, Islam bestows some intriguing sexual incentives. While it is a sin for a male to have sex with an unmarried woman, Allah makes an exemption for the Muslim male who rapes the women of the infidels that he kills. Muhammad did just that.

    This explains why any time Islamic warriors defeat another nation, they call the inhabitants kafir (the one who, according to the Qur'an, is ungrateful to the blessings showered by Allah) and rape their women. Pakistani Muslim soldiers raped a quarter of a million Bangali women in 1971 after they massacred 3 million unarmed civilians. This atrocity is not considered a sin in Islam, because the religious leader of the soldiers decreed that Bangladeshis were infidels.

    The Islamic temptation to wage violent war against non-Muslims also involves the sexual incentive of the houries (the 72 eternal virgins in paradise that are given to the Muslim warrior who dies in battle). The houri makes earthly women even more redundant. Yet even the individual houri herself is not sacred or special in any way. As Fatna Sabbah notes, she "has no spiritual dimension; she is a thing because she has neither will nor any possibility of development. . . . [she] has no intellect; she does not think. She is a thing that awaits consumption."

    The houri is a manifestation of the ultimate misogyny.

    In thinking about Atta’s will in this context, his worries become understandable. So does his rage. A male cannot despise women and simultaneously love himself. Misogyny is the ultimate death wish.

    Men like Atta and Osama bin Laden detest – and wish to destroy – the world that they see outside their cages. It is a world that delights in the beauty that they have demonized -- outside and inside of themselves.

    ALL SERIAL KILLERS, almost without exception, are severely sexually abused as children. The kind of people who hijack a plane with innocent people and drive it into a building with thousands of other innocent people are related to this phenomenon.
    When sociopaths rape and kill, they do not see their victims as human beings, but only as objects. This is because the sociopaths were themselves, at one time, used as objects - as their bodily integrity was repeatedly violated. The rage that results from sexual abuse is one thing, but when combined with living in a dysfunctional culture of sexual repression and misogyny, where love is reduced to violent domination, it is quite another.

    Throughout the Islamic Middle East, men and women are taught to be vehemently opposed to pleasure, especially of the sexual variety. Men are raised not only forbidden to touch women, but to even look at them. Sex before marriage is not just a sin -- but a criminal offence. It is punishable by a severe beating at best, and an execution at worst.

    The sexual privileges that are allowed in Islamic cultures are permitted to men. Women's sexuality and social independence represent major threats to male supremacy and are tightly controlled. Thus, as the Moroccan feminist Fitna Sabbah reveals in her book Woman in the Muslim Unconscious, there is a disturbing conflict in the Middle East between sexual libido and repression. A deep-seated fear of, and hostility to, individuality prevails, and its main expression exists in misogyny.

    Socially segregated from women, Arab men succumb to homosexual behavior. But, interestingly enough, there is no word for "homosexual" in their culture in the modern Western sense. That is because having sex with boys, or with effeminate men, is seen as a social norm. Males serve as available substitutes for unavailable women. The male who does the penetrating, meanwhile, is not emasculated any more than if he had sex with a wife. The male who is penetrated is emasculated. The boy, however, is not, since it is rationalized that he is not yet a man.

    In this culture, males sexually penetrating males becomes a manifestation of male power, conferring a status of hyper-masculinity. It is considered to have nothing to do with homosexuality. An unmarried man who has sex with boys is simply doing what men do. As the scholar Bruce Dunne has demonstrated, sex in Islamic societies is not about mutuality between partners, but about the adult male's achievement of pleasure through violent domination.

    There is silence around this issue. It is the silence that legitimizes sexual violence against women, such as honor crimes and female circumcision. It is also the silence that forces victimized Arab boys into invisibility. Even though the society does not see their sexual exploitation as being humiliating, the psychological and emotional scars that result from their subordination, powerlessness and humiliation is a given. Traumatized by the violation of their dignity and manliness, they spend the rest of their lives trying to get it back.

    The problem is that trying to recover from sexual abuse, and to recapture one's own shattered masculinity, is quite an ordeal in a culture where women are hated and love is interpreted as hegemonic control.

    With women out of touch - and out of sight -- until marriage, males experience pre-marital sex only in the confines of being with other males. Their sexual outlet mostly includes victimizing younger males - just the way they were victimized.

    In all of these circumstances, the idea of love is removed from men's understanding of sexuality. Like the essence of Arab masculinity, it is reduced to hurting others by violence. A gigantic rupture develops between men and women, where no harmony, affection or equality is allowed to exist. In relationships between men, meanwhile, affection, solidarity and empathy are left out of the picture. They threaten the hyper-masculine order.

    It is excruciating to imagine the sexual confusion, humiliation, and repression that evolve in the mindsets of males in this culture. But it is no surprise that many of these males find their only avenue for gratification in the act of humiliating the foreign "enemy," whose masculinity must be violated at all costs - as theirs once was.

    Violating the masculinity of the enemy necessitates the dishing out of severe violence against him. In the recent terrorist strikes, therefore, violence against Americans served as a much-needed release of the terrorists' bottled-up sexual rage. Moreover, it served as a desperate and pathological testament of the re-masculinization of their emasculated selves

    The Sexual Rage Behind Islamic Terror
    By Jamie Glazov, October 4, 2001

    Roya Tolouee’s Ordeal
    by Showan Khurshid

    09 June, 2006

    What happened to Ms Tolouee is part and parcel of what happens to thousands of other women in Islamic countries, who are subject to degrading treatment, homicide, in the name of honour, and genital mutilation. These acts may happen elsewhere within other cultures, but the perpetrators in civilised societies are regarded as criminals and investigation follows. We do not hear of any investigations in the Islamic countries regarding abuse of power and violations against women. The Islamic regime of Iran has been known for using sexual abuse as a means of interrogation, yet no public enquiry has been conducted to investigate. The predicament of women should be expected as Islam allows no more than an inferior position for women.[1] More degradingly, Islam allows sexual acts with the womenfolk of conquered people. Ironically, “Allah the merciful” who seems to be obsessed with Mohammed’s sexuality, tells Mohammed that prisoners of war are lawful for him.[2] So all what a criminal needs in order to excuse sexual violation is to regard a helpless woman as non-Muslim. The fact that the Sunnis and Shiites can so easily deny that the other side being Muslims makes it very likely that Ms Tolouee was told that she is not Muslim. This is not in fact a one off incidence. Talaban committed the same acts against Hazara women. Moqtada Sadre’s thugs were doing the same in Southern Iraq. Iraqi army and Arab militia during Saddam did the same in South Kurdistan. Some Kurdish women were even sold to Egypt and Sudan. The same thing is still happening in Darfur.

    One should have no illusion that women’s position in Islam is any better than sex objects, and vessels of recreation, although, at best, a private sex object which explains why they have to be hidden and veiled.[3]

    Muslim apologists may deny this argument, but the verses in the endnotes below make that clear.[4] The situation of Muslims and Islam is also due to the fact that there is no concept of human rights in Islam. People are not allowed to doubt Islam, or convert away from Islam (read what the “revered” Muslim scholar, who was invited by Ken Livingston, Dr Yusuf Al-Qaradawi has to say). When violence is allowed the violent cunning psychopath individuals or groups prevail. This pattern is repeated in the history of Islam, communism where Stalin could prevail over Trotsky and Saddam over his other rivals who were to some degree less criminally-minded than himself.

    Ms Tolouee’s ordeal is also a part of same pattern that the tribes and ethnicities have experienced and will experience who are subjected to Islam. For hundreds of years , the Kurds, their weakness stemming from the fact that their land-locked terrain does not allow massive concentration of population with concentration of power, where even a small band of men can defy the authorities, have been subjected to unending campaigns to destroy their autonomous political structure.

    The evolutionary political theory suggests that the application of all ideologies can result in atrocities being committed. Simply, Islam and other ideologies have no built-in measures to ensure that the strong will not oppress and even annihilate the weak. Thus it is natural that the weak nation and the weak gender and even the weak section of society fall victim so easily to the strong and the manipulative.[5] However, Islam is particularly uncivilised. What else can we extrapolate from a religion that disdains art, and a religion whose prophet demands that the fifth of the spoils should be his, and that he allowed sex with female prisoners of war.[6] Would not disdaining arts breed a vulgar nation and would not such incentive fuel an army of thugs and criminals? Indeed, Muslims and Mohammed before other Islamic leaders, as historians know, used mercenaries.

    Now while I hope that Ms Tolouee finds strengths in herself to endure the trauma of her ordeal. She should only think that she has not been disgraced at all. She is a victim like all Kurds, whether Muslims or not. Indeed, she is a victim like all humanity, who are suffering or will be suffering because of this religion, and particularly because of some selfish interests of sociopaths like Ahmedinijad or Khomeini, and many other brainwashed individuals, trying to impose this uncivilised religion upon us. Such acts, which does not draw any protest at all from Muslims, should be a call for all people who care about morality and human decency to abandon this religion.


    [1] ‘Men Have authority over women because God has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because God has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and forsake them in beds apart, and beat them. Then if they obey you, take no further action against them. Surely God is high, supreme’ (The Koran 4:34, p. 83).

    See also the respect for women in Islam:

    ‘They question thee (O Muhammad) concerning menstruation. Say: It is an illness, so let women alone at such times and go not in unto them till they are cleansed. And when they have purified themselves, then go in unto them as Allah hath enjoined upon you. Truly Allah loveth those who turn unto Him, and loveth those who have a care for cleanness. Your women are a tilth for you (to cultivate) so go to your tilth as ye will, and send (good deeds) before you for your souls, and fear Allah, and know that ye will (one day) meet Him. Give glad tidings to believers, (O Muhammad)’ (Pickthal, The quran 2:222 &223).
    If anyone has a doubt as to the origin of hijab or veil read this verse.
    ‘O Prophet! Tell thy wives and thy daughters and the women of the believers to draw their cloaks close round them (when they go abroad). That will be better, so that they may be recognised and not annoyed. Allah is ever Forgiving, Merciful’ (Pickthal, The quran, 33:59).

    [2]‘O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful unto thee thy wives unto whom thou hast paid their dowries, and those whom thy right hand possesseth of those whom Allah hath given thee as spoils of war, and the daughters of thine uncle on the father's side and the daughters of thine aunts on the father's side, and the daughters of thine uncle on the mother's side and the daughters of thine aunts on the mother's side who emigrated with thee, and a believing woman if she give herself unto the Prophet and the Prophet desire to ask her in marriage - a privilege for thee only, not for the (rest of) believers - We are Aware of that which We enjoined upon them concerning their wives and those whom their right hands possess - that thou mayst be free from blame, for Allah is ever Forgiving, Merciful’ ((The Koran, Pickthal, 33:50).

    [3]Nowadays sex has a dirty connotation in the mind of Muslims that is why in southern Iraq when a man mentions women while talking with other men, he apologises first in the same manner one talks about animals like dogs and donkeys or dirty things.

    [4] It is true that Quran contains some verses suggesting kind treatment of women. But these do not sound veracious or at best very circumscribed. How else can some allow taking women as spoil of war and then talk of respect to them?

    [5] This is the reason that the Darfurians who are killed, displaced and raped, though, Muslims are completely ignored – the Arab League to culminate its insolence convened in Khartoum as a sign of further support for the Arab regime, even the Kurdish the Iraqi Kurdish foreign minister did not express a qualm about attending the meeting there.

    [6] ‘They ask thee (O Muhammad) of the spoils of war. Say: The spoils of war belong to Allah and the messenger, so keep your duty to Allah, and adjust the matter of your difference, and obey Allah and His messenger, if ye are (true) believers’ (Pickthal: Quran, 8:1).

    Showan Khurshid is the author of : "Knowledge Processing, Creativity and Politics: A Political Theory based on the Evolutionary Theory" which can be purchased here
    about Muhammad’s sadism.
    Bukhari 7, 71.589

    "Some people were sick and they said, "O Allah's Apostle! Give us shelter and food. So when they became healthy they said, "The weather of Medina is not suitable for us." So he sent them to Al-Harra with some she-camels of his and said, "Drink of their milk." But when they became healthy, they killed the shepherd of the Prophet and drove away his camels. The Prophet sent some people in their pursuit. Then he got their hands and feet cut and their eyes were branded with heated pieces of iron. I saw one of them licking the earth with his tongue till he died."

    But that is not all. Your Allah is also a sadist. Take a look:

    4.56 Those who reject our Signs, We shall soon cast into the Fire: as often as their skins are roasted through, We shall change them for fresh skins, that they may taste the penalty: for Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise.

    Isn’t this sadism?

    Again you put your foot in your mouth when you throw in sadism. Islam is sadism. It is a cult created by a sadist psychopath.

    Pedophilia: You either forgot or intentionally did not talk about this mental disease. This happens also in the West and the tolerance of the Westerners towards it is inexistence. The pedophiles are hunted down and locked up to protect the children. However you conveniently did not mention it because pedophilia is not a crime in Islamic world at all. Many men have pedophilic relations with young boys and marrying children is also a sunnah. In fact pedophilia in Islam is so normal that Muhammad in his sick way of thinking promised "pearly boys" to his faithful followers. The thought of that is sickening but the fact that Muhammad makes it part of the heavenly rewards shows he thought is it something pleasurable.

    52:24 Round about them will serve, (devoted) to them. Youths (handsome) as pearls well-guarded.

    وَيَطُوفُ عَلَيْهِمْ غِلْمَانٌ لَّهُمْ كَأَنَّهُمْ لُؤْلُؤٌ مَّكْنُونٌ

    A 20 year old girl was going out with her sister to do some shopping, they live in al-E?lam district in Baghdad. Here sister notices that she has forgotten a purse or something so she goes back and leaves the older sister on the main street on her own, when she gets back older sister is nowhere to be found. Two days later the family gets a phone call from the local police station telling them that there is a girl here they should come pick up. The kidnappers, it seems, after they had what they wanted just threw her off at the police station. She has bruises all over her body, she was returned without her veil and her mother talks with hushed tones of r.a.p.e. She had just been married one month ago and now the husband won?t even come see her. He is throwing her away. The girl screams whenever someone touches her, when the lights go off or on, when someone talks loudly. Not only has the girl been brutally violated now her family shunts her and keep her locked in the house. She brings shame open them through her rape, no one thinks of what she has gone through. (Salam Paz)
    With these religious psychopaths, it's all projection.

    See these related articles:
    The Childhood Origins of Terrorism, Lloyd deMause
    The Wellsprings of Horror in the Cradle, Alice Miller
    The Sexual Rage Behind Islamic Terror, Jamie Glazov
    -->The School for Violence, Riane Eisler.
    Yes, This Is About Islam, Salman Rushdie
    Afghan Boy Gets Lesson in Manhood, Philip Caputo.

    Sunday, February 15, 2009


    Letter to the Germans

    [First published at the original Islamic Danger on Tuesday, September 26, 2006. Includes the link to the famous The Downfall of the Netherlands ('De ondergang van Nederland') Land of the Naive Fools by Mohammed Rasoel]

    [Reprinted also at Islamic Danger 2U]

    A Letter to the Germans from one who cares for the well-being of the German nation and of all of Europe:



    Moslems are not the Jews!

    Some of you might not be too comfortable with what happened to the Jews of Europe some sixty years ago. You are perhaps concerned about offending the sensibilities of another group in your midst--let me warn you: Don't be! Do not bend over backwards to accomodate Islamics. They will eat you alive!

    You see my dear German friends: The MOSLEMS ARE NOT LIKE THE JEWS. Islam is NOT A RELIGION like the one the Jews practice, quietly without infringing on anybody's rights.

    Islam is an ideology that demands all othes knuckle under to it. They--the Islamics (I like that term it's sort of a contraction of Islam and clerics--get it? Islamics)--the Islamics are not like Jews. Islamics make demands: they want this, they want that, they want head scarves obligatory for all females, not only Islamic ones. They want mosques everywhere, blaring out the muezzin's call to prayer to the faithful, so foreign to European ears.

    Islamics would prefer pork were not sold or eaten, it offends them. They do not want women wearing revealing clothes (it might excite the oh-so-pure-in-thought Moslem males and cause them to lose control and --well--you know what they do then).

    But they demand. They are insulted. Their prophet is insulted. Their pride is insulted.

    German, do not feel bad about not giving in to any--to all--of their demands for apologies for not observing Islamic customs yourselves.

    Stand up to them. These are not Jews that you may want to handle with kid gloves because of memories that are not quite comfortable yet.

    Do not coddle the Islamics to make up for what was done by prior generations to the Jews.

    No. Islamics are not Jews and you can--you should stand up to them. Refuse their demands. Who are they, these foreign "Asylum seekers" and what have you, to make demands on the citizens of the country that took them in?

    They should be grateful for what you have done for them, but they are not. They threaten, they whine, they rage, they want you to cringe,

    You see, my dear Germans, they are not Jews. What Jews would have tried to intimidate the citizen of their host country?

    Islamics want you to be afraid of them, to fear their rage, their threats of throat slittings and head off-choppings (abzuhacken). They want you to fold up and let Eurabia become the reality not the goal. Eurabia now! They want. "We will get it, never you fear. We will outbreed you. we will have you living under our 'protection.'" (or not at all.)

    Germans, don't you see: These are not the Jews about whom you might have an uneasy conscience. Don't worry, you can resist them. Do not let them play on your perhaps subconscious feelings

    By being so sensitive to the sensibilities of the Islamics, you are not being kind to the memory of the Jews that not only made no demands, certainly did not try to strike fear in your hearts , spoke your language fluently, contributed to your literature even, your music, your art, and did not insist that their laws and customs be followed by Germans.

    Whence comes your reluctance, Germans, to stand up to those who refuse to be part of you but want you to become part of them or be their "Untermenschen?"

    Well, from a Moslem himself you might be surprised to learn. A Moslem who dare not use his name nor reveal himself in the country that accepted him and treated him as a human being: one of your fellow European countries, Holland.

    Here is what he writes:

    "There they stand, the Dutch with their completely justified and without doubt noble striving to dissociate themselves as far away as possible from Hitler's ideology. Completely blind to the fact that their path circles back to the other end at the Jews (with all due respect). The poor devils continue to misunderstand that a choice isn't necessarily between the Nazis or the Jews, predator or prey, oppressor or victim, but that there is an alternative, a third road, which is save yourself and guarantee the continuance of your own culture and your own country. It's simply this one, tiny misunderstanding, that will make the Dutch go down in history as the people who thought so deeply about a nightmare from the past that they ended up becoming that nightmare."

    - Mohammed Rasoel

    vom dem Buch

    The Downfall of the Netherlands
    ['De ondergang van Nederland']

    Land of the Naive Fools

    by Mohammed Rasoel [or Rasool]
    Translation courtesy of Faust

    So, you see, my dear Germans, do not make the mistake that he accuses the Netherlanders (die Hollaender) of having made. Do not make amends for what happened to the Jews of Europe of yesteryear by knuckling under to the Islamics of today.

    [Please, my Dear Germans, remember the valiant Mohammed Rasoel's admonition:

    ["save yourself and guarantee the continuance of your own culture and your own country" ]

    Remember what the Danes said to the Islamics that threated and demanded after the cartoons appeared in Denmark.

    If you cannot recall, let me refresh your memory:

    After the Mohammed Cartoons, the Danes begged the Islamics's pardon for having offended them. Their apology is non pareil--without parallel-- in the annals of European-Islamic relations. And here it is in all its simple beauty:

    The Excuse of the Danes for the Cartoons that offended the sensibilities of the Islamics in Denmark first and of course of all Islamics in the world, who apparently are always waiting for an incident that they can pounce upon and give vent to their inborn rage.

    (If you have seen this before, bear with me please. Reread the the abject apology of the Danes to the Islamics.)

    Here it is:

    We're Sorry

    (Auch gut fuer die muslime der ganzen Welt die in unsern Laendern uns das Blut aussaugen)

    We´re sorry we gave you shelter when war drove you from your home country....

    We´re sorry we took you in when others rejected you....

    We´re sorry we gave you the opportunity to get a good education....

    We´re sorry we gave you food and a home when you had none....

    We´re sorry we let you re-unite with your family when your homeland was no longer safe...

    We´re sorry we never forced you to work while WE paid all your bills....

    We´re sorry we gave you almost FREE rent,phone,internet,car and school for your 10 kids...

    We´re sorry we build you Mosques so you could worship your religion in our Christian land...

    We´re sorry we never forced you to learn our language after staying 30 years!...

    And so....from all Danes to the entire Muslim world, we just wanna say:

    F**K YOU!!

    (This apology also applies to all the Islamics of the world that have been sucking the life-blood from the nations that gave them asylum, or shelter, and welcomed them as "new citizens.")

    --from the Book "Hurra, wir kapitulieren" by Henryk M. Broder

    To be certain that all Germans, whether they are proficient in English or not understand this abject apology from the deeply sorry Danes, it is reprinted in their native language, in German, here:

    Es tut uns leid, dass wir euch aufgenommen haben, als andere euch ablehnten...

    Es tut uns leid, dass wir euch die Gelegenheit gaben, einen gute Ausbildung zu erhalten...

    Es tut uns leid, dass wir euch Essen und ein Zuhause gaben, als Ihr keines von beiden hattet...

    Es tut uns leid, dass wir eure Familie nachkommen ließen, als eure Heimatländer nicht mehr sicher waren...

    Es tut uns leid, dass wir euch nie zur Arbeit gezwungen haben, während wir alle eure Rechnungen bezahlt haben...

    Es tut uns leid, dass wir euch in unseren Sozialwohnungen wohnen ließen, euch Telefone, Internet, Autos und Schulbildung für eure zehn Kinder gaben...

    Es tut uns leid, dass wir Euch erlaubt haben Eure Moscheen in unserem christlichen Land zu bauen, damit Ihr Eurem Glauben nachgehen könnt...

    Es tut uns leid, dass wir Euch in den 30 Jahren die Ihr bei uns lebt, nie gezwungen haben, unsere Sprache zu lernen...

    Deshalb, ...von allen Dänen an die gesamte moslemische Welt, nur ein einziges:

    F**K YOU!!

    [es ist schwer die letzten zwei Worte auf Deutsch zu uebersetzen. Villeicht kann mir jemand damit helfen. Danke sehr.]

    Saturday, February 14, 2009

    Flag stomping: Sacrilege*? Or tit for tat?

    From Tundra Tabloids coes this disturbing (huh? what?) report:

    College Republicans Protest Hamas by Standing on Their Allah-Inscribed Flag.......


    A Protest is a Protest--I mean, ain't it?

    If one side in a war can do it, why not the other?

    Of course, we have the usual Moslemic whining and outrage--but that is to be expected.

    *sacrilege: gross irreverence toward a hallowed person, place, or thing

    Swedish: vanhelgande

    Tuesday, February 10, 2009

    An Arya's views: Question to Muslims

    Question to Muslims

    [by an Arya]

    If we Pagans, who worship many idols once in a day, are proud of idolatry; then why Muslims, who worship one idol at least five times a day, are ashamed of accepting themselves are idolaters?

    The idol worshipped by Moslems is of course "invisible" but has all the characteristics of a stone or clay idol: it demands blood sacrifice. It has iron-clad demands. It cannot be approached except through a priest--in its case, a lone priest--the only one who has heard its strictures and commands, although through a third entity. I leave it to you to supply the name by which this idol is addressed. lw.

    Monday, February 9, 2009

    Is it Time for Jews to Join with the BNP (British National Party)?

    . . . to form a united front against the Islamics who pose a danger to both--Great Britain (the UK) and Jews worldwide, especially to those in the Jew's country: Israel.

    Leslie White Says: February 9th, 2009 at 8:55 am


    Unfortunately, the only hope for stemming the Islamization of the UK is the BNP (British National Party). Although this party has of late cast off its inbuilt antisemitism (supposedly)–see — many British Celt-Anglos (white skin, red or blond hair, blue eyes) still consider Jews among the “non-whites” or “mixed” with dubious racial antecedents.

    That is, although for the time being, the BNP is on the same side as Jews when facing the Islamic menace, whether its members will welcome Jews as fellow British subjects were the Islamics to be contained or preferably removed from the British Isles remains up in the air.

    On the foregoing link to a pro-Israel British blog-site, visible support for Israel is given. Also, however, is a link to a book detailling “who is white,” which relegates the Jews to what appears to be a non-white “mongrel” status. Skin color alone appears not to be the specific criterion separating “Nordic whites” from “Semites.” One supposes that the admixture feared by the “Nordics” is that of Africans, originally stemming from the sub-Saharan regions.

    Be these Hitlerian and pre-Nazi racial particularizations as they may, fully trusting “Nordic-superiority” movements that appear to be part and parcel of the BNP to be Judeophilic is premature, to say the least. BNP support for Israel is certainly welcomed, but whether “Jews okay in Israel but not among Northern Europeans” should be acceptable to Jews is questionable at least or at most be subject for outright rejection.

    Even hawks joining with wolves to stand against hyenas appears a risky venture (on part of the hawks–let alone if we substitute hawks with doves, by which too many Jews can be symbolized).

    Previous post re Jews and BNP: Opinions about the BNP (British National Party)
    The Bald-Headed Geek: An open message to one of my blog readers

    Sunday, February 8, 2009

    Jihadis Post Scenario for the Defeat of the United States

    By Abdul Hameed Bakier, Erich Marquardt

    Thanks to forwarding this

    Published at the original Islamic Danger on Saturday, December 08, 2007

    On May 14 [2007], jihadi forum users Abu Kandahar and Roslan al-Shami posted a five-point scenario for the collapse of the United States and the rise of the Islamic ummah, entitled, "The Next Strikes in the Heart of America, When and How." It appeared on the forum, although at least one other jihadi forum,, reposted the scenario. The posting outlines a scenario for attacking the United States, although the sheer size of the operation suggests that it is jihadi propaganda and not an actual plan that could be operationalized. The alleged operation is dedicated to Abu Omar al-Baghdadi, the head of the Islamic State of Iraq.

    The first stage in the scenario involves multiple terrorist attacks on three major U.S. cities, preferably with nuclear weapons, using an unspecified number of trucks. The scenario places priority on attacking New York City because it is the central artery of the U.S. economy and it would prove that the mujahideen are capable of recurrent attacks on the same target. The second city to attack is Los Angeles, an important West Coast "atheist" city. The third "city" to be attacked is Florida because, they argue, it is an East Coast congregation city and has the Kennedy Space Center (considering the description, the statement's authors probably meant Orlando). While those are the three primary cities for attack, the writers of the document suggest that if the mujahideen wish to expedite the collapse of the United States, they should also conduct attacks in Seattle since it is a strategic border city; Washington, DC, the political center of the United States; and cities in Texas, since the "biggest oil companies" are located there.

    According to the writers, the purpose of attacking these specific cities is to cause a sharp decline in the U.S. economy; mass amounts of casualties; the support for the mujahideen by anti-U.S. countries such as Cuba and Venezuela; a decrease in American support for their own government; the withdrawal of the "blasphemous" U.S. military from Islamic territories; mass military desertions; and the inability to fuel U.S. military fighter jets. The document also outlines how the fallout from such large-scale attacks would cause the U.S. military to return to the United States in order to conduct massive relief operations. They refer to the example of how Hurricane Katrina overburdened the U.S. National Guard, calling the hurricane a "Soldier of God."

    After such attacks, they argue that the Islamic State of Iraq will seize the opportunity to launch mass strikes on the apostates in the Iraqi military and police, paving the way for the third stage of the scenario: the commencement of the golden era of the triumphant Islamic conquests that includes the implementation of Sharia, the liberation of the Arabian Peninsula, the removal from power of "the U.S. ruling family" in Jordan and, finally, the big march toward Palestine. In the end, even Washington, DC, will fall to the mujahideen and that will conclude the final stage of Islamic control of the globe.

    The scenario appears less of a planned operation than a hope for the fulfillment of a prophecy. The supposed factuality of the scenario is based on various verses in the Quran and the Prophet Muhammad's teachings. Nevertheless, some of the users on the forums who discussed the scenario asserted that all of the details to execute the operation had already been prepared. One such user, by the alias of Abu Nedal, said, "For your knowledge, the operations are ready and awaiting the orders from our leader Osama bin Laden, God protect him, to decide what he deems appropriate either to strike now or to wait."

    Islamist extremists have always fabricated factitious scenarios for victory over the West based on their own interpretations of Quranic prophecies in times of crisis and defeat. Nevertheless, al-Qaeda has shown prior interest in acquiring nuclear materials for use in an attack, and it is necessary to take such forum postings seriously as they display the mindset and the intent, although perhaps not the capability, of al-Qaeda-affiliated militants.
    ACT for America
    P.O. Box 6884
    Virginia Beach, VA 23456

    "The scenario appears less of a planned operation than a hope for the fulfillment of a prophecy. The supposed factuality of the scenario is based on various verses in the Quran and the Prophet Muhammad's teachings."
    --from the foregoing posted material here

    Which is why when studying Islamic warfare and attack methods, we should be familiar with the accursed koran.

    See how the attack on the WTC towers was signalled long before the strike on them:

    Wherever you are, death will find you, Even in the looming tower.”
    fourth sura of the Koran*

    This could have given the astute student of islamic warfare a clue--could have, not necessarily should have.

    YUSUFALI: "Wherever ye are, death will find you out, even if ye are in towers built up strong and high!" If some good befalls them, they say, "This is from Allah"; but if evil, they say, "This is from thee" (O Prophet). Say: "All things are from Allah." But what hath come to these people, that they fail to understand a single fact?

    PICKTHAL: Wheresoever ye may be, death will overtake you, even though ye were in lofty towers. Yet if a happy thing befalleth them they say: This is from Allah; and if an evil thing befalleth them they say: This is of thy doing (O Muhammad). Say (unto them): All is from Allah. What is amiss with these people that they come not nigh to understand a happening?

    SHAKIR: Wherever you are, death will overtake you, though you are in lofty towers, and if a benefit comes to them, they say: This is from Allah; and if a misfortune befalls them, they say: This is from you. Say: All is from Allah, but what is the matter with these people that they do not make approach to understanding what is told (them)?

    Islam delenda est

    urbanadder22 said...
    "The scenario appears less of a planned operation than a hope for the fulfillment of a prophecy. The supposed factuality of the scenario is based on various verses in the Quran and the Prophet Muhammad's teachings."Which is why when studying Islamic warfare and attack methods, we should be familiar with the accursed koran.See how the attack on the WTC towers was signalled long before the strike on them:"Wherever you are, death will find you, Even in the looming tower."fourth sura of the KoranThis could have given the astute student of islamic warfare a clue--could have, not necessarily should have.